| |
|
American Lung Association Supports Tax Profiling |
|
Column
Rating: General |
|
Published: Jan 6, 2004, 9:30am |
In the American Lung Association 2003 Report the ALA shows how increasing taxes on consumers reduces tobacco use, increases state revenues and allows the funds to be used by states to fill current budgetary shortfalls. What they didn’t address in the report was the isolation, the targeting and focus on one specific type of person is more than just profiling, its discrimination based upon a choice to use or not to use tobacco products.
In the report they stated “The potential benefit of raising cigarette taxes is enormous. Higher taxes make cigarettes more expensive, which deters kids from starting to smoke and motivates adults to stop. Tax monies should be used to fund comprehensive tobacco prevention programs and lower health care costs in the future. And, in today’s era of state financial woes, raising tobacco taxes can help plug budget holes.” As well they added “Additionally, the CDC found that minority, younger and lower-income populations would be more likely to reduce or quit smoking in response to a price increase.”
I don’t know about you but this form of thinking is remedial at best. Spend them into submission! Break them financially so they will stop smoking! And if they keep smoking use the taxes to fill budget gaps in your state! Who cares about the smoker’s financial situation, just keep giving us more and more and more of your money!
Last time I checked this was a free country that allowed its citizens to make free decisions. And we all remember what happened in Boston when Tea was overtaxed!
If taxes are going to be levied against smokers at a level that is out of proportion to any other product use by consumers including coffee, alcohol, prescription drugs, furs and diamonds, luxury automobiles, and even gasoline they better be prepared for a backlash by smokers and non-smokers alike. This is pure discrimination and profiling of adult smokers.
And what else happens when taxes and retail prices are forced to higher levels? Black market cigarettes, reduced quality cigarettes, and even more so, they raise the desirability level and make them even cooler to smoke. Reference our period of alcohol prohibition for a good example.
People are not dumb. They understand that cigarette smoking is not good for them. They also understand that they have a choice to make when it comes to the continued use of tobacco products. They also understand that the money from the Master Settlement Agreement and the over-taxation of tobacco products is not making it to the youth prevention and adult cessation programs that it should be going to. Cigarette manufacturers are now in legal proceedings to find out why the funds are not being used properly per the agreement**. Yet the ALA wants more funds to be used for filling budgetary shortfalls.
But as if the discrimination of being a smoker was not bad enough, they take it to the next level and isolate out the poor, minorities and younger smoker at an even higher level and without remorse for what they are doing to this classes of people.
While I respect what the American Lung Association stands for I am in complete awe that an organization created to benefit the masses would isolate, discriminate and support profiling.
** http://www.industrypages.com/artman/publish/Industry_News_2461.stm
copyrighted materials - Do Not Duplicate without expressed written permission from B2
View All Columns by B2
Visit B2 website
[ Discuss this column ]
Visit the
Tobacco Industry Forum
Please Read: USE
POLICY
The opinions and or comments contained in
columns appearing in CLMman are the opinions of the writer of the column
and not necessarily the opinion of Industry Pages, Inc. Industry Pages,
Inc. does not support or endorse in any way the comments or opinions
contained within a submitted column and in no way can be held liable for
its contents.
By using CLMman you agree to indemnify Industry Pages, Inc., its vendors,
partners, employees and associates from any issue arising from its use.
The articles themselves are owned and are the copyright of
the writer of the article. The writer of the article has provided Industry
Pages Inc. expressed written permission to have the articles available on
the Industry Pages Network, CLMman and the CLMman Column Webfeed. Any use of
the articles outside the CLMman system requires written permission from the
writer of the article itself. If you have
any comments about this column please feel free to express your opinion in
the Forums.
Article © Copyright Jan 6, 2004 B2
CLMman © Copyright 1998 - 2004 Industry Pages,
Inc.
Top of Page
|